Jump to content

260114-00: Difference between revisions

From Game in the Brain Wiki
Created page with "## 1.1 Objectives and Timeline ### Objective To conduct a structured discovery, analysis, and high-level design (HLD) process that results in clear, actionable documentation of the client’s business workflows. This enables informed ERP adoption, implementation planning, and alignment with ERPNext’s modular structure. ### Timeline Considerations The timeline for Discovery, Analysis, and HLD depends heavily on two main factors: 1. **Access to Subject Matter Expert..."
 
Replaced content with "test"
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
## 1.1 Objectives and Timeline
test
 
### Objective
 
To conduct a structured discovery, analysis, and high-level design (HLD) process that results in clear, actionable documentation of the client’s business workflows. This enables informed ERP adoption, implementation planning, and alignment with ERPNext’s modular structure.
 
### Timeline Considerations
 
The timeline for Discovery, Analysis, and HLD depends heavily on two main factors:
 
1. **Access to Subject Matter Experts (SMEs)**
 
  * The availability of SMEs—those who know the day-to-day processes—is the most critical determinant of project pace.
  * Delays often occur when SMEs are also operationally loaded and cannot allocate sufficient interview or validation time.
  * Early scheduling and clear communication of required SME participation mitigate these delays.
 
2. **Process Depth and Maturity**
 
  * Many organizations, especially **non-ISO 9001-certified** ones, have **undocumented or implicit processes**. Tasks and decision paths are often delegated informally and vary between staff members.
 
  * This increases the required number of interviews and validation sessions per department to reconstruct accurate workflows.
 
  * For **ISO 9001-compliant** organizations, discovery can proceed faster, as written procedures and process manuals exist. However, even in these cases, several factors affect actual speed:
 
    * **Process maturity levels** vary: some departments may have up-to-date process maps, while others rely on legacy or outdated versions.
    * **Backlog of process updates**: procedure documents may not reflect recent system or personnel changes.
    * **Backlog of training and definition**: staff may be unfamiliar with the formalized version of their process, requiring clarification and confirmation.
 
### Typical Duration (Guideline)
 
| Phase                          | Description                                                      | Duration  | Dependencies                              |
| ------------------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------- | --------- | ------------------------------------------ |
| **1. Discovery**              | Stakeholder interviews, workflow collection                      | 2–3 weeks | SME access, process documentation maturity |
| **2. Analysis**                | Validation, bottleneck identification, Lean alignment            | 1–2 weeks | Availability of validated data            |
| **3. High-Level Design (HLD)** | ERPNext process mapping, A3 document creation, procedure linking | 1 week    | Approved workflows from prior phase        |
 
**Total Duration:** Typically 4–6 weeks for a medium-sized enterprise, subject to stakeholder availability and the organization’s documentation maturity.

Latest revision as of 14:51, 14 January 2026

test